Minor Loss (K-Value) Calculator
Resistance coefficient K for fittings and valves by the Crane TP-410, Hooper 2-K, and Darby 3-K methods, with the Reynolds and size dependence the simple method misses.
When to use this calculator
Use when you need the K-value of a fitting rather than a table figure, especially on small-bore lines, viscous service, or at low Reynolds number where the classic Crane approach breaks down. Crane treats K as a fixed multiple of the friction factor, which works well for large turbulent lines but under-predicts badly in laminar and transitional flow. The 2-K and 3-K methods add explicit Reynolds and diameter terms, and having all three side by side shows how much the choice actually matters.
Required inputs
- Fitting or valve type, from the reference database
- Nominal pipe size and inside diameter
- Reynolds number, or the flow conditions to derive it
- Method — Crane, Hooper 2-K, or Darby 3-K
Expected outputs
- K value by each method
- The constants used (L/D and f_T, or K1/K∞, or K1/K_i/K_d)
- Equivalent length, and the pressure drop the fitting contributes
Formula overview
D_in is inside diameter in inches, D_nom nominal size in inches — the 2-K and 3-K constants are defined on imperial diameters. K is dimensionless; ΔP comes out in Pa with ρ in kg/m³ and V in m/s.
Crane TP-410 K = (L/D) · f_T
Hooper 2-K K = K1/Re + K∞ · (1 + 1/D_in)
Darby 3-K K = K1/Re + K_i · (1 + K_d / D_nom^0.3)
Then ΔP = K · ρV²/2, or as an equivalent length L_eq = K·D/f.Worked example
Standard 90° elbow on a 6" line at Re = 100 000:
Crane: L/D = 30, f_T ≈ 0.015
K = 30 × 0.015 = 0.45
Hooper 2-K: K1 = 800, K∞ = 0.25, D_in = 6.065
K = 800/100 000 + 0.25 × (1 + 1/6.065)
= 0.008 + 0.291 = 0.30
A 50% spread between the two methods on the same fitting — and the
gap widens further as Reynolds number falls, where the K1/Re term in
the 2-K method grows and Crane stays flat.Common mistakes
- Using Crane K-values at low Reynolds number. In laminar and transitional flow the true resistance rises sharply, and a fixed (L/D)·f_T can under-predict the loss by a large factor — viscous and small-bore service is where the 2-K or 3-K method earns its keep.
- Using the flowing friction factor instead of f_T in the Crane method. f_T is the fully turbulent factor for the pipe size, a fixed value per size, not the f computed for the actual flow.
- Mixing K bases. A K value belongs to a specific reference velocity and diameter. Applying a K derived for the fitting bore to the velocity in the adjoining line — or vice versa — is a common and silent error at reducers and valves with reduced ports.
FAQ
Learn
Related articles
Pipe Sizing Calculation คืออะไร
ทำความเข้าใจหลักการเลือกขนาดท่อจาก flow rate และ velocity พร้อมสมการพื้นฐานที่วิศวกรใช้จริง
Pressure Drop Calculation
คู่มือคำนวณการสูญเสียความดันในระบบท่อ (Pressure Drop) ด้วย Darcy–Weisbach Equation, Reynolds Number, Friction Factor และ Minor Losses พร้อมตัวอย่างคำนวณจริงสำหรับวิศวกร
วิธีคำนวณ Hydrotest Pressure
หลักการคำนวณความดันทดสอบ hydrostatic ตาม ASME B31.3 สำหรับงาน commissioning